2013-№1(38) Article 9

T.V. Fedoseeva, G.I.Yershova

To a problem of literary paradox. p. 82-92.

UDC 82.0

The article offers a review of existing literary paradox definitions and finds the tradition to present it as a stylistic figure. At the same time the tendency of modern literary criticism to
a broad interpretation of the concept is noted. The author suggests a more general version of the paradox definition, which would be used in the study of different levels of structural organization and content of a literary text.

a relevance of the problem of literary paradox, a classical tradition, a stylistic figure, an artistic technique, a structural organization, a creative principle.

References:

1. Ben, G.E. Paradoks [Paradox]. Kratkaja literaturnaja jenciklopedija: v 9 t. [Short literary encyclopaedia, 9 vol.] ed.: A.A. Surkov. Moscow, Soviet encyclopedia Publ., 1968, vol. 5, pp. 591–592.

2. Beresneva, A.V. Strukturno-funkcional’nye osobennosti paradoksal’nyh vyskazyvanij v nemeckom jazyke. Diss. cand. filol. nauk [Structural-functional features of paradoxical statements. Diss. cand. of Philology]. Moscow, 2009. 176 p.

3. Birjukova, E.E. Pojetika hronotopicheskogo paradoksa v russkoj proze 1920–1930-h godov: P. Romanov i S. Krzhizhanovskij. Diss. cand. filol. nauk. [Poetics of chronotopic paradox in Russian prose of 19201930-ss: P. Romanov i S. Krzhizhanovsky. Diss. cand. of Philology]. Samara, 2006. 208 p.

4. Gornfel’d, A. Figura v pojetike i ritorike [Figure in poetics and rhetoric]. Jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ F.A. Brokgauza i I.A. Efrona [Dictonary by Brokgauz F.A. and Efron I.A.]. St. Petersburg,1902, vol. 35a, pp. 647–650.

5. Lyapon, M.V. K izucheniju semantiki paradoksa [To paradox semantics studies]. Russkij jazyk v nauchnom osveshhenii – The Russian language in scientific interpretation, 2001, no. 2, pp. 90–106

6. Paradoks [Paradox]. Literaturnaja jenciklopedija terminov i ponjatij [Literary encyclopedia of terms and notions]. ed.: A.N. Nikoljukin. Moscow, ISISS RAS, Intelvak Publ., 2001. 717 p.

7. Paradoks [Paradox]. Literaturnyj jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Literary encyclopedic dictionary]. ed.: V.M. Kozhevnikov, P.A. Nikolaev. Moscow, Soviet encyclopedia Publ., 1987. 267 p.

8. Paradoksy russkoj literatury [Paradoxes of the Russian literature]. Peterburgskij sb. st. [ St. Petersburg collected articles]. ed.: V. Markovich, V. Shmid. St.Petersburg, INAPRESS Publ., 2001, ed. 3. 352 p.

9. Pogrebnjak, G.A. Pojetika paradoksal’nogo v maloj satiriko-jumoristicheskoj proze pervoj treti XX veka: A. Averchenko, Sasha Chernyj. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Poetics of paradoxical in small satiric-comic prose of the first third of XX century: A. Averchenko, Sasha Cherny. Diss. Cand. of Philology]. Samara, 2003. 142 p.

10. Semen, G.Ja. Lingvisticheskaja priroda i funkcionirovanie stilisticheskogo priema paradoksa: na materiale anglijskogo jazyka. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic character and functioning of paradox stylistic device: based on English. Diss. Cand. of Philology]. Odessa, 1985. 197 p.

11. Timofeev, L.T. Paradoks [Paradox]. Literaturnaja jenciklopedija: v 11 t. [Literary encyclopedia: in 11 vol.]. Moscow, Soviet encyclopedia Publ., 1934, vol.8, pp. 442–443.

12. Tozyjakova, E.A. O.I. Senkovskij – baron Brambeus: principy hudozhestvennogo miromodelirovanija. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [O.I. Senkovsky – baron Brambeus: principles of artistic world creating. Diss. Cand. of Philology]. Tomsk, 2007. 169 p.

13. Shmid, V. Zametki o paradokse [Notes on paradox]. Paradoksy russkoj literatury: Peterburgskij sb. st. [Paradoxes of the Russian literature: St. Petersburg collected articles]. ed.: V. Markovich, V. Schmid. St. Petersburg, INAPRESS Publ., 2001, ed. 3, pp. 9–16.

14. Jakunin, A.V. Koncepcija paradoksa v hudozhestvennom soznanii Osipa Mandel’shtama. Diss. kand. filol. nauk. [The paradox concept in artistic consciousness of Osip Mandelstam. Diss. Cand. of Philology]. Komsomol’sk-na-Amure, 2002. 162 p.

15. Jashina, E.A. Tipologija paradoksov v hudozhestvennom tekste [Typology of paradoxes in artistic text]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie – Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2007, no. 4, pp. 181–186.

16. Paradox. Ed.: Chris Baldick. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. N.Y.: Оxford university press, 2001. 183 p.